EFFECTIVENESS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT IN CORRUPTION CRIMES IN INDONESIA: ANALYSIS OF AUTHORITY AND SANCTIONS

Abstract

Corruption remains a major issue in Indonesia, causing not only significant financial losses to the state but also undermining public trust in the legal system. Three main institutions are responsible for handling corruption cases: the Police, the Prosecutor's Office, and the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). However, overlapping authority among these institutions often leads to inefficiencies in law enforcement. Additionally, the relatively light penalties imposed on corruption offenders reduce the deterrent effect of anti-corruption laws. This study adopts a juridical normative approach, analyzing relevant regulations and legal literature. The findings indicate that the issue of overlapping authority has been partially addressed through the signing of Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) between institutions, though implementation still faces challenges. The effectiveness of penalties for corruption offenders can be evaluated through three dimensions: legal substance, legal structure, and legal culture. This study emphasizes the need for more consistent coordination and stronger penalties to improve the effectiveness of corruption law enforcement in Indonesia